From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 14:23:51 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/libbsd: needs an (e)glibc toolchain In-Reply-To: <1402309581-18430-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> References: <1402309581-18430-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Message-ID: <20140609142351.47e08090@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Yann E. MORIN, On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 12:26:21 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > -comment "libbsd needs a toolchain w/ threads" > +comment "libbsd needs an (e)glibc toolchain w/ threads" > depends on ( BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 ) > - depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS > + depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS || !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC Is it possible to have a glibc toolchain without threads? I think no. In this case, what is our policy? Should we keep both the glibc and thread dependencies? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com