From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:46:10 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] ti-gfx: bump to version 5_01_01_01 if EABIhf is used In-Reply-To: <1402427667-26813-1-git-send-email-hadrien.boutteville@gmail.com> References: <1402427667-26813-1-git-send-email-hadrien.boutteville@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20140610214610.03f16f6c@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Hadrien Boutteville, On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:14:27 +0200, Hadrien Boutteville wrote: > +# SDK 5_01_01_01 only support EABIhf so we downgrade to 5_01_00_01 if we can't > +# use it. The wording is a bit confusing here: you say that "we downgrade to 5_01_00_01 if we can't use it", which to me doesn't make much sense, as we downgrade to something we can't use :-) > ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y) > +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_01_01 > TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_hardfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin > else > +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01 > TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_softfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin > endif > > +TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475 Is the TI_GFX_SO_VERSION the same between both versions of ti-gfx? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com