From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 09:39:25 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] toolchain/uclibc-ng: add support for uClibc-ng In-Reply-To: <53FE6512.9050600@mind.be> References: <20140811113124.GA19506@waldemar-brodkorb.de> <53FE6512.9050600@mind.be> Message-ID: <20140828093925.6bbffb1b@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:09:06 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > What a surprising lack of reaction on this patch! I'd have expected people to > welcome this very much... Yes, sorry for the lack of reaction. I definitely welcome this very much! > However, I'll start with immediately burning it to the ground :-) I think the > situation of uClibc-ng is very similar to eglibc: it's essentially the same > package, just a different version of it. So, instead of creating a whole new > copy, I think it's easier to maintain if it is one more uclibc version in > package/uclibc/Config.in. I definitely agree. For now, uclibc-ng build system and process is essentially the same as the one of uclibc, so I'd prefer to see it being handled by package/uclibc/. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com