From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:11:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] libelf: Removes the package In-Reply-To: <1409219230-17443-5-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> References: <1409219230-17443-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <1409219230-17443-5-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20140828131122.2a0d4533@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Gregory CLEMENT, On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:47:10 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > The elfutils package provides a more recent version of the > libelf. Some packages such as ltrace need this more recent > version. Having two packages providing the same library leads to some > conflicts or dependency problems. For instance at the end we had only > one libelf.a when the 2 packages were selected. > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT > --- > package/Config.in | 1 - > package/libelf/Config.in | 7 - > package/libelf/libelf-0.8.10-Elf64-fixups.patch | 12361 ---------------------- > package/libelf/libelf.mk | 23 - > 4 files changed, 12392 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 package/libelf/Config.in > delete mode 100644 package/libelf/libelf-0.8.10-Elf64-fixups.patch > delete mode 100644 package/libelf/libelf.mk When removing a package, the config option of the package should be moved to Config.in.legacy to allow the user to be warned that he is using a no longer available package. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com