From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] rpi-userland: Add patches to fix compilation with musl libc
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:11:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140912171106.246cfd12@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4834283.TufUKxLIMj@hyperion>
Dear Maarten ter Huurne,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:56:37 +0200, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
> That's what you'd expect from the HAVE_* name, but there isn't a timer_h
> check in the rpi-userland build system. There is a hardcoded "CFLAGS+=-
> D_HAVE_TIMER_T" for a single application inside rpi-userland, the other
> applications don't define it.
>
> The reason I wrote "every application" is that this header can be indirectly
> included by applications using EGL:
>
> $ output/host/usr/bin/pkg-config --cflags egl
> -I/home/mth/pi/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-pingux-linux-
> musleabihf/sysroot/usr/include/
> -I/home/mth/pi/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-pingux-linux-
> musleabihf/sysroot/usr/include/interface/vcos/pthreads/
> -I/home/mth/pi/buildroot/output/host/usr/arm-pingux-linux-
> musleabihf/sysroot/usr/include/interface/vmcs_host/linux/
>
> In theory -D_HAVE_TIMER_H could be added to Cflags in egl.pc, but that might
> interfere with application packages. At least in the context of Buildroot,
> where none of the supported libcs require this typedef, disabling this check
> is the safest approach, in my opinion.
>
> Also I wonder if there really is a platform on which this typedef helps: it
> would only help on a platform that does implement POSIX timers (it's an
> optional feature), but for some reason doesn't define timer_t. It just
> doesn't sound very likely...
>
> Looking at the header again, I see it doesn't actually use timer_t anywhere.
> In fact, nowhere in the entire rpi_userland package is timer_t used. So the
> whole check + typedef can just be removed.
Ok, thanks a lot for the explanation. Then just remove the definition,
and submit the patch upstream.
>
> > Also, could you submit those patches upstream? We don't like much to
> > carry a lot of patches in Buildroot, so the more patches can be merged
> > upstream, the better.
>
> https://github.com/raspberrypi/userland/issues/202
> https://github.com/raspberrypi/userland/pull/201
Great!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-12 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-12 1:45 [Buildroot] [PATCH] rpi-userland: Add patches to fix compilation with musl libc Maarten ter Huurne
2014-09-12 7:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-12 14:56 ` Maarten ter Huurne
2014-09-12 15:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-09-12 17:01 ` Maarten ter Huurne
2014-10-17 15:57 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] rpi-userland: bump revision for musl compile fixes Maarten ter Huurne
2014-10-17 20:31 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-10-18 11:05 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-10-18 11:34 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-10-18 12:15 ` Maarten ter Huurne
2014-10-18 13:02 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-10-18 16:46 ` Maarten ter Huurne
2014-10-18 17:16 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-10-18 17:22 ` Maarten ter Huurne
2014-10-18 17:58 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4] rpi-userland: bump revision and add patch to fix compile with musl Maarten ter Huurne
2014-10-19 10:32 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-10-19 14:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140912171106.246cfd12@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox