From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:50:30 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/cdrkit: standardize site URL In-Reply-To: <5447DF1F.3040100@mind.be> References: <1413983659-3496-1-git-send-email-kaszak@gmail.com> <20141022152231.1ecdf27a@free-electrons.com> <5447DF1F.3040100@mind.be> Message-ID: <20141023095030.5bc53eba@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:45:19 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > We've discussed this before and IIRC nobody was against getting rid of > BR2_DEBIAN_MIRROR. Well, looking back through my mail archives, it looks like > you (Thomas) said a couple of times to use snapshot instead of BR2_DEBIAN_MIRROR > and nobody objected. > > I certainly agree that using snapshot is a better idea. We now have a mix of 17 > packages using BR2_DEBIAN_MIRROR and 10 packages using snapshot.debian.org, and > AFAIK we never had any problem with the snapshot packages. I agree. So Karoly, feel free to work on a patch series moving all packages fetching their source code from Debian to use snapshot.debian.org, and then removing BR2_DEBIAN_MIRROR. Thanks a lot! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com