From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 20:01:25 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] inetutils: new package In-Reply-To: References: <1414624048-37143-1-git-send-email-kaszak@gmail.com> <852735167.27218624.1414655605361.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> <20141030094018.GH1759@tarshish> <20141030125801.GO1759@tarshish> Message-ID: <20141101200125.509c0b89@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear K?roly Kasza, On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 19:33:16 +0100, K?roly Kasza wrote: > I investigated the matter further. > Looks like inetutils won't overwrite ifconfig or ping, because of a simple > reason: it installs the binaries elsewhere. > In these cases, both binaries will be present, and the $PATH will choose > which to call. This is not great. We don't really like having two variants of the same tool in the filesystem. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com