From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 22:46:20 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] qt5: expose a QT5_QMAKE variable for other Qt5 packages In-Reply-To: <87fve02cbm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <1414880111-19166-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1414880111-19166-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <87mw8943vw.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20141103222519.7c8797e9@free-electrons.com> <87fve02cbm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20141103224620.5c3ffe1d@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Peter Korsgaard, On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:39:41 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >> Should we just use BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE everywhere you check for BR2_PACKAGE_QT5? > > > Where exactly? Or shouldn't we have qt5base selected as soon as qt5 is > > enabled? > > Well, that's perhaps the easiest solution, yes. Having qt5 enabled but > not qt5base doesn't make any sense. > > Will you send an updated series or should I do that here? I can, but not this week. I'm busy giving a training, and will not have much free time. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com