From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 18:24:13 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] systemV init without busybox series In-Reply-To: <1415281013-1077-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1415281013-1077-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20141106182413.198106d0@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Gustavo Zacarias, On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 10:36:46 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > The series is still missing start-stop-daemon which is contained in the dpkg > upstream package which begs the question, should we ship it as dpkg (with the > side consequences and expectations) or name it start-stop-daemon and install > just that? (option 2 is what i've got done at the moment, that's my choice, > but be free and vote). Have you seen "[PATCH] start-stop-daemon: new package" already submitted by Karoly Kasza a few days ago? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com