From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH next] python-certifi: add new package
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:04:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141119000429.65c6a8c3@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546BC6D7.5060909@mind.be>
Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:23:19 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> > We need a depends on BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON || BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON3 here. I
> > know it's not very useful since Python packages can anyway only be
> > selected when either Python or Python 3 are enabled, but we have this
> > conditional for all Python packages, so we should remain consistent and
> > have it there as well.
>
> Well, a quick grep in next shows that we have 8 packages without this depends,
> and 14 packages with the depends.
>
> However, since the python packages that have recently been added by Peter do
> not have the depends, and since he told Yegor to remove the depends in
> python-webpy, I think the rule now is _not_ to have the depends.
Damn, so the guy doing most of the Python maintenance, and who did
introduce the possibility of building modules with both Python 2 and
Python 3, doesn't have a word into such decisions? Where are we
going? :-)
> > So the licensing details of this package are pretty unclear. Can you
> > dig a little bit, and see what is the actual license for this package?
>
> It's pretty clear to me: the certificate database itself is MPL, the python
> code around it is ISC.
> Actually, since it's only about 5 lines of code, I doubt the python code is even
> copyrightable, but let's ignore that :-)
So probably we need a more precise <pkg>_LICENSE data than just "ISC",
no?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-18 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-17 20:20 [Buildroot] [PATCH next] python-certifi: add new package Yegor Yefremov
2014-11-18 22:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-18 22:23 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-11-18 23:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-11-19 7:22 ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-11-19 9:57 ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-11-19 7:20 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141119000429.65c6a8c3@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox