From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 22:31:29 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/4] libfm-extra: new package In-Reply-To: <20141210212821.GI3926@free.fr> References: <1416583990-35169-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> <20141210205715.GE3926@free.fr> <20141210221006.5ab0d254@free-electrons.com> <20141210212821.GI3926@free.fr> Message-ID: <20141210223129.358afb43@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Yann E. MORIN, On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 22:28:21 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Yes, the GPL gobbles up the LGPL, because of its stronger requirements. > But licensing wise, they are both applicable licenses. > > Even worse in this case, the resulting combination is probably just > LGPLv2.1+, since the only compiled file is LGPLv2.1+. Ah, indeed if the only compiled files are LGPLv2.1+, then the _LICENSE should state that, because it's quite important. Usually something like LGPLv2.1+ (library), GPLv2+ (). Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com