From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:45:51 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit] erlang: use libatomic_ops if available In-Reply-To: <8761dbkbr6.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <20141215215003.A758F80403@busybox.osuosl.org> <20141216132618.5c19cb84@free-electrons.com> <8761dbkbr6.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20141216134551.75ca7975@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Peter Korsgaard, On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:41:33 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > Is this really what we want to do? In such cases, we normally always > > force to use the "system" version of the library rather than the > > built-in one. Why should Erlang be treated differently, especially if > > using the "system" version of the library works fine? > > So in other words, make erlang select libatomic_ops? That sounds fine to > me. Yes, that's what I meant: make erlang select libatomic_ops. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com