From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] qt5: bump to version 5.4.0
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:02:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141226160241.574a1ae0@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1419595603-15591-3-git-send-email-fatih.asici@gmail.com>
Dear Fatih A??c?,
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:06:42 +0200, Fatih A??c? wrote:
> qt5base:
> - Add patches to fix uClibc build.
> - Remove -no-c++11 option since qt5connectivity needs some C++11
> features.
Hum, we don't really have a good "handling" of C++11 in Buildroot. I
believe C++11 is only available starting from certain gcc versions, no?
So maybe not all toolchains will support C++11 ?
> qt5webkit:
> - Remove egl patch. This should be fixed with CONFIG += egl option.
Hum, looking at the patch, I don't really understand this. The patch
does add some include paths when EGL is enabled. How does CONFIG += egl
solves the problem?
> ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_LICENSE_APPROVED),y)
> QT5BASE_CONFIGURE_OPTS += -opensource -confirm-license
> -QT5BASE_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 or GPLv3.0
> -QT5BASE_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.GPL LICENSE.LGPL LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt
> +QT5BASE_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3
> +QT5BASE_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3
So the license of qt5base is not the same as the license of the other
Qt modules?
For the other Qt modules, I see:
> +QT5CONNECTIVITY_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5CONNECTIVITY_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5DECLARATIVE_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5DECLARATIVE_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
Qt5enginio is also different?
> +QT5ENGINIO_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3
> +QT5ENGINIO_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3
> +QT5GRAPHICALEFFECTS_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5GRAPHICALEFFECTS_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5IMAGEFORMATS_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5IMAGEFORMATS_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5MULTIMEDIA_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5MULTIMEDIA_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5QUICK1_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5QUICK1_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5QUICKCONTROLS_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5QUICKCONTROLS_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5SCRIPT_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5SCRIPT_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5SENSORS_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5SENSORS_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5SERIALPORT_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5SERIALPORT_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5SVG_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5SVG_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5WEBKIT_EXAMPLES_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +# Source files contain references to LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt but it is not included
> +# in the archive.
> +QT5WEBKIT_EXAMPLES_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
For qt5webkit, I can understand why the license is different.
> +QT5WEBKIT_LICENSE = LGPLv2+ (WebCore), LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +# Source files contain references to LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt but it is not included
> +# in the archive.
> +QT5WEBKIT_LICENSE_FILES += LICENSE.LGPLv21 LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> else
> -QT5WEBKIT_LICENSE = LGPLv2+, MIT, Commercial license
> +QT5WEBKIT_LICENSE = LGPLv2+ (WebCore), Commercial license
> +QT5WEBSOCKETS_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +# Source files contain references to LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt but it is not included
> +# in the archive.
> +QT5WEBSOCKETS_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5X11EXTRAS_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5X11EXTRAS_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
> +QT5XMLPATTERNS_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 with exception or LGPLv3 or GPLv2
> +QT5XMLPATTERNS_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.LGPLv21 LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt LICENSE.LGPLv3 LICENSE.GPLv2
Maybe we should define some variables in package/qt5/qt5.mk for the
license stuff, and re-use $(QT5_LICENSE) and $(QT5_LICENSE_FILES) in
the various packages in order to avoid this duplication?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-26 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-26 12:06 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] libxkbcommon: bump to version 0.5.0 Fatih Aşıcı
2014-12-26 12:06 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] qt5: remove hash file of the non-existing package Fatih Aşıcı
2014-12-26 14:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-12-26 12:06 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] qt5: bump to version 5.4.0 Fatih Aşıcı
2014-12-26 15:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-12-29 8:07 ` Fatih Aşıcı
2014-12-26 12:06 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] qt5: update URLs to use Qt's new domain Fatih Aşıcı
2014-12-26 14:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] libxkbcommon: bump to version 0.5.0 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-12-27 10:13 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-12-27 15:49 ` Yann E. MORIN
2014-12-27 16:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141226160241.574a1ae0@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox