From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 09:34:06 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 00/29] SELinux Buildroot Additions In-Reply-To: References: <1418702062-61039-1-git-send-email-matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com> <20150101224717.2a063a90@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150106093406.4e249077@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Matthew Weber, On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 21:37:29 -0600, Matthew Weber wrote: > > It looks like they have set things up to support backwards > > compatibility with separate releases for the different packages, > > however I'd rather refactor the patchset to use the new approach. > > I just noticed that the release script they use is intentionally > packaging each folder/package separately, so it does look like that's > their current approach (even in a single repo). I think we still > should consolidate it into a single package. For every disadvantage I > can think of for having it as one package, I can see resolving those > through a temporary patch or the way the Kconfig exposes what's built. I disagree: they are still shipping the thing as separate tarballs for each component, so we should continue to have separate packages in Buildroot. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com