From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:34:10 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] toolchain/external: do not accept distro-class toolchains In-Reply-To: <20150127221604.134cffdb@free-electrons.com> References: <1422225691-15930-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <54C7FF64.3030501@mind.be> <20150127221604.134cffdb@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150128183410.GA4231@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Arnout, Thomas, All, On 2015-01-27 22:16 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:13:08 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > > This sounds as if the problem is that the binary can't be moved to a different > > place. But for pre-installed external toolchains, we don't do that. > > > > But I guess the real problem is that we can't copy the libs to the staging dir, > > right? So perhaps that should be written in this remark. > > Yes the problem is more that such toolchains typically don't have a > clean sysroot, with just the C library, C library headers and kernel > headers. Well, both. They are tainted with a lot of cruft we are not interested in, indeed. But since the sysroot is not a sub-directory of the --prefix, they are not relocatable either. I'll update the error message to take your comments into account. Thanks! :-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'