From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 08:09:31 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] glibc and locale In-Reply-To: <54D7F4F8.3040005@ou.edu> References: <54D7F4F8.3040005@ou.edu> Message-ID: <20150209080931.147fac1c@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Steve Kenton, On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 17:44:56 -0600, Steve Kenton wrote: > I have a script that wants the locale program. I notice that is is already built > as part of the glibc build process, but it is not installed. Would there be > any objections to something along these lines to go ahead and install locale? > I'm not sure if this is the best way since glibc build uses autotools. This looks ok, but I am wondering how that would be done with the uClibc and musl C libraries. Remember that we support three different C libraries, so when we're doing a change to one of them, we always need to check what needs to be done for the two other ones. Best regards, Thomas Petazzoni -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com