From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2015-02-25
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:50:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150227055054.GP2402@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87egpc477h.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:51:46PM +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Baruch" == Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> writes:
>
> > Hi Thomas, list,
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:30:13AM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> >> x86_64 | make-4.1 | NOK |
> >> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b80a34a602b1241bc03cd43df1a269389d50e75c/
>
> > Nice.
>
> > So we package different versions of the same library under different names.
> > The library is the Boehm-Demers-Weiser garbage collector that we carry under
> > the names bdwgc (7.2f), and libgc (7.4.0). The following build order seems to
> > triggers the error:
>
> > bdwgc (guile dependency)
> > guile
> > libgc
> > make
>
> > guile links with bdwgc as a mandatory dependency. make-4.1 configure script
> > finds guile and pulls -lguile-2.0 and -lgc to its link command. But libgc
> > builds before make, thus overwriting bdwgc. When make attempts to link with
> > libgc it fails because of missing getcontext, a problem that is fixed in bdwgc
> > by a local patch.
>
> > I have verified that building guile, libgc, and make, in that order,
> > reproduced this build failure.
>
> > I suggest to just remove libgc in master, event though it was added first,
> > because no other package depend on it.
>
> Yes, bdwgc seems like a more sensible name. We should add
> Config.in.legacy handling for LIBGC though.
>
> But presumably version 7.4 would be nicer to have than 7.2f (if nothing
> else then because it doesn't have the arch dependencies).
Right. Just sent a patch. But this is -next material, I believe.
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-27 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 7:30 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2015-02-25 Thomas Petazzoni
2015-02-26 9:30 ` Alex Suykov
2015-02-26 18:39 ` Baruch Siach
2015-02-26 22:51 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-02-27 5:50 ` Baruch Siach [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150227055054.GP2402@tarshish \
--to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox