From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:36:56 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 00/13] autobuild-run: python3 compat and misc improvements In-Reply-To: <06D2305A-C43B-470D-A1C3-941D44CB367B@gmail.com> References: <1424899050-24932-1-git-send-email-dywi@mailerd.de> <20150226110858.183d31f3@free-electrons.com> <54F258AD.5040301@mailerd.de> <06D2305A-C43B-470D-A1C3-941D44CB367B@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20150302093656.14272535@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Thomas De Schampheleire, On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:52:41 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: > Thanks for clarifying, it makes more sense to me now. Keeping argparse but using the > dict-merging isn't too bad, it would address my main concern with the original > code (the not-so-beautiful handling of the arguments). > > So Thomas P: it's your call now: I'm just as ok with going for the approach proposed > by Andr?. I really don't know to be honest. Originally, I was really in favor of keeping a solution that doesn't require external modules, but you pushed docopt, and I ended up being OK with it. So if now you tell me there is a reasonable solution without docopt, why not. Who would do the rework? Andr?, are you willing to do it? The thing is that there is still a number of very useful improvements in the branch provided by Thomas DS. So in fact, I believe I might be applying Thomas DS patches first, and then if someone wants to revert back to argparse for argument parsing, a follow-up series should be sent. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com