From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:59:52 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] perl: needs host-bison In-Reply-To: <54F592F2.80405@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1425378663-2659-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20150303114820.32b71d7b@free-electrons.com> <54F592F2.80405@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20150303115952.176deea6@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Gustavo Zacarias, On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:54:42 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > For TARGET_MAKE_ENV maybe since it's only PATH, for HOST_MAKE_ENV it's > not and it'll need extra testing to see that perl's build system doesn't > fluke with the extras. Worth trying IMO. > So splitting between BR_PATH and TARGET_MAKE_ENV is possible but not > visually consistent. > Which begs the question: why do other packages use BR_PATH in the same > way as well? (without using *_MAKE_ENV) Because they should be using *_MAKE_ENV :-) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com