From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 17:30:48 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] uclibc: add patch fixing non-threaded build on Xtensa for uClibc-ng 1.0.0 In-Reply-To: <20150307154325.GH3937@waldemar-brodkorb.de> References: <1425735600-16762-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1425735600-16762-4-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20150307144013.GE4186@free.fr> <20150307154325.GH3937@waldemar-brodkorb.de> Message-ID: <20150307173048.4652ee0c@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Waldemar Brodkorb, On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 16:43:26 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > May be then we get an extra package for uClibc-ng? No, I'm still not convinced we need separate packages at this point. Maybe in the future if uClibc and uClibc-ng diverge significantly, but it's not the case right now. > Bernhard is planning 0.9.34 release, so it is more a theoretically > problem. I am sure uClibc-ng 1.1 is out before uClibc tags 1.0.0. I'll wait for real acts from Bernhard before presuming that something will happen in uClibc land. It may very well that we'll get rid of uClibc support entirely in favor of uClibc-ng before Bernhard gets to doing a new release for uClibc. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com