From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 08:13:33 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/openssl: Enable parallel build In-Reply-To: <20150308023136.GS12857@vapier> References: <1416146446-27060-1-git-send-email-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20141118225525.6e8b4e02@free-electrons.com> <20150308023136.GS12857@vapier> Message-ID: <20150308081333.2396758d@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Mike Frysinger, On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 21:31:36 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i've tried before and only got some of it in. i could try again since upstream > openssl has changed a bit. Would be good. > > I discussed this with Yann, and I believe Peter will agree that it's a > > feature patch that we shouldn't take in Buildroot. The solutions are > > either to take this patch upstream, or in Buildroot build in parallel > > and then fallback to serial build if the parallel build has failed. > > Something along the lines of: > > > > $(MAKE) -C $(@D) || $(MAKE1) -C $(@D) > > unfortunately, that is not safe. it might end up with incomplete static > archives. at least, that was some of the errors we saw in the past that > made me investigate making openssl parallel safe. Ah, ok. So I guess so far our only luck is to get something done by the upstream OpenSSL folks. Can you let us know the outcome of this effort? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com