From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:06:51 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 3/4] package/avrdude: depends on libftdi1
 instead of libftdi
In-Reply-To: <CAHXCMMJWtxrVB2nai6V7y_-5ijr5zpXpNBS=G9LbtbBfDrLd4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1425813964-5295-1-git-send-email-s.martin49@gmail.com>
 <1425813964-5295-4-git-send-email-s.martin49@gmail.com>
 <20150308114842.GB2518@tarshish>
 <CAHXCMMJ30MEE33mytg4xy9pZePD0Z+ezH8pJE6wzhaqJWdkyGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150316141523.2561f737@free-electrons.com>
 <CAHXCMM+52vee+K8p=KOonr=d+F4M7bk-5zWMG2Q2ghmGyWTKLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150317174836.6384db5a@free-electrons.com>
 <CAHXCMMJWtxrVB2nai6V7y_-5ijr5zpXpNBS=G9LbtbBfDrLd4g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150317210651.11bf1534@free-electrons.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Dear Samuel Martin,

On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:25:52 +0100, Samuel Martin wrote:

> Nope, the behavior is not undefined: if libftdi gets built before
> arvdude, libftdi1 will also be built before avrdude (because it's one
> of its deps,)

Hum, I don't follow you here. I don't see where libftdi depends on
libftdi1.

What prevents from doing a configuration that has libftdi and avrdude
enabled, and not libftdi1 ?

Apparently nothing:

$ grep -E "(LIBFTDI|LIBFTDI1|AVRDUDE)" .config
BR2_PACKAGE_AVRDUDE=y
BR2_PACKAGE_LIBFTDI=y
# BR2_PACKAGE_LIBFTDI1 is not set

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com