From: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Added linux drivers backports project
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 01:02:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150417230243.GB3800@t61> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55316095.5090902@mind.be>
> In the future, please give your patch a version number (by giving the argument
> -v3 or --subject-prefix='PATCH v3' to git send-email or format-patch). Also
> include a changelog below your SoB, separated by --- (you can do this while
> amending your commit).
Fixed, hope it's correct this time. Sent as -v4.
> Actually, kconfig-package should probably do a default assignment for
> LINUX_BACKPORTS_MAKE_ENV, but since it doesn't you have to do it explicitly.
I need LINUX_BACKPORTS_MAKE_ENV, as KLIB and KLIB_BUILD aren't set.
> However, ince below you're calling modules_install directly, would it be
> possible/reasonable to do the build in the same way? It's always nice if the
> different CMDS definitions look the same. So
> $(LINUX_BACKPORTS_MAKE_ENV) $(MAKE) $(LINUX_BACKPORTS_MAKE_OPTS) \
> -C $(LINUX_DIR) M=$(@D) \
> modules
> But if the backports build system does some extra magic (NOT kconfig stuff, but
> other magic), then of course you shouldn't do this.
Unfortunately it has to be build this way (or I haven't found any better).
LINUX_BACKPORTS_BUILD_CMDS needs -C $(@D), otherwise there is infinite loop. I'm
surprised, as $(@D) is backport directory (I'd expect to be add automatically) - suppose I
have an error somewhere.
LINUX_BACKPORTS_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS needs -C $(LINUX_DIR) M=$(@D)
=> different commands.
> No nconfig? Not that it matters much...
Taken from busybox where it wasn't (sent as separate patch). Added...
BTW: I'd expect to have one unique default variable for all of those.
Kind regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-17 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-17 9:40 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Added linux drivers backports project Petr Vorel
2015-04-17 9:40 ` Petr Vorel
2015-04-17 19:35 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-17 23:02 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-17 9:33 Petr Vorel
2015-04-17 9:33 ` Petr Vorel
2015-04-17 19:44 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-15 21:55 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/1] " Petr Vorel
2015-04-15 21:55 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] " Petr Vorel
2015-04-16 20:29 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-17 8:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-17 9:03 ` Petr Vorel
2015-04-17 9:14 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150417230243.GB3800@t61 \
--to=petr.vorel@gmail.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox