From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] rtai: remove option BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_EXT_RTAI_PATCH
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:02:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150421220210.GD4262@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5536C826.8080904@mind.be>
Arnout, All,
On 2015-04-21 23:59 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle spake thusly:
> On 21/04/15 23:47, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Arnout,
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:45:17 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> >
> >> This requires legacy handling. With in the help text something like
> >>
> >> The BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_EXT_RTAI_PATCH option never worked, so it is
> >> probably not useful. If you do have a valid use case and it used to
> >> work for you, please let us know on buildroot at buildroot.net.
> >
> > Well, I talked about Config.in.legacy handling in the commit message:
>
> TL;DR :-)
>
> >
> > """
> > Bottom line is that this feature has never worked, so there is not
> > even a point in adding Config.in.legacy support for it.
> > """
> >
> > Should I understand that you don't agree with this reasoning, and still
> > want Config.in.legacy handling?
>
> Yep, because if someone _does_ have it set, it probably works for them and we
> should know about it. If nobody has it set, then it doesn't hurt to have it in
> legacy.
But there is absolutely *no way* this can work *at all*, as demonstrated by
Thomas.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 21:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH] rtai: remove option BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_EXT_RTAI_PATCH Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-21 21:45 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-21 21:47 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-21 21:59 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-21 22:02 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2015-04-21 22:02 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-04-22 20:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150421220210.GD4262@free.fr \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox