From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/zeromq: enable kernel-based feature flags
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:47:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150421224751.1eebfde3@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5509FBEB.8040505@mind.be>
Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 23:27:55 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> It's been a while ago, of course, but I think one problem was that the symbols
> are also defined by the toolchain, so they exist even if the kernel doesn't
> support them.
If the flags exist in the toolchain, then it means that the toolchain
is using a certain version of the kernel headers. Running with a kernel
older than that will anyway not work.
I mean, there are zillions of configure script that tests if the
toolchain has syscall foo() or bar() by simply doing a compile time
test. They don't actually check if the user is stupid enough to run on
a system that has a kernel older than the kernel headers + C library
combination used in the toolchain.
Or am I missing something specific to those flags?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 9:25 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/zeromq: enable kernel-based feature flags Lionel Orry
2015-03-15 22:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-16 6:43 ` Lionel Orry
2015-03-16 8:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-18 22:27 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-21 20:47 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-04-21 21:48 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-21 13:30 Lionel Orry
2015-04-21 13:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-21 13:39 ` Lionel Orry
2015-04-21 20:19 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-04-22 6:01 ` Lionel Orry
2015-04-22 7:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-22 5:54 ` Lionel Orry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150421224751.1eebfde3@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox