From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Suykov Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 01:02:34 +0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC v2 0/5] common service startup files In-Reply-To: <20150422231143.2b2921e2@free-electrons.com> References: <20150422231143.2b2921e2@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150422220234.GA11809@vostro> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:11:43PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Thanks for this proposal. However, as you have seen, the general > feedback was not very positive. We don't really like having a > specialized language being created for Buildroot, so the overall > approach doesn't really match the "spirit" of how things are done in > Buildroot. > > I've marked the corresponding patches as rejected in our patch tracking > system. Ok, yeah, the initial reaction was pretty clear and I thought it has been marked as rejected for several weeks already. Looks like it wasn't, so people got those patch reminders and started replying. -*-- And a kind of follow-up: I've got a bunch of systemd service files as a by-product of this effort, some of them for packages that have no systemd hooks at present. If you're interested, I could either upload them somewhere for you to pick up, or alternatively start sending patches myself. One package at a time, without any global infrastructure changes.