Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] Solid-Run HummingBoard i2eX defconfig and bootable microSD Bash script
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 12:02:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150531090226.GE2282@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505311014390.1709@tanhuma.tkos.co.il>

Hi Yonatan,

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:40:20AM +0300, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2015, Baruch Siach wrote:
> >On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:31:24AM +0300, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
> >>+BINS="fdisk mkfs.ext4 mount umount dd mktemp partprobe"
> >>+for BIN in ${BINS}
> >>+do
> >>+	if ! which ${BIN} >/dev/null
> >>+	then
> >>+		echo "${ME} ERROR: Required executable ${BIN} is not in PATH"
> >>+		ERROR=$((${ERROR}+1))
> >>+	fi
> >>+done
> >
> >Buildroot can build host versions of util-linux (fdisk, mount, umount),
> >e2fsprogs (mkfs.ext4), and parted (partprobe). In that case you should find
> >these utilities under ${BUILDROOT_OUTPUT_DIR}/host/usr/sbin/.
> 
> For fdisk it might be better to use the Buildroot host utility rather than
> deal with the differences in fdisk between the common Linux distros.

Or even better, use sfdisk. sfdisk script should be more resistant to breakage 
on future util-linux versions.

> But for the other utilities that are almost always present, is it work
> adding them to the defconfig and increasing the build time and volume?

I don't think they should be added to defconfig. But if the user selected 
these host packages this script should use them.

> >Buildroot can create ready made ext{2,3,4} images itself. See 'Filesystem
> >images -> ext2/3/4 root filesystem' in menuconfig.
> 
> This script allows you to defer the decision on the filesystem type to a
> later stage by just using rootfs.tar. In terms of project management, I
> think that this is the best strategy. That is, to make a clean separation
> between build issues and installation issues, not to confound them.

Filesystem generation makes this script unnecessarily complex, IMO. Going for 
a single partition solution (see below) would make this script (and 
board/freescale/create-boot-sd.sh) simpler, and easier to maintain.

> >>+if ! mount ${PART1} ${MOUNT_POINT}
> >>+then
> >>+	echo "${ME} ERROR: Cannot mount ${PART1} on ${MOUNT_POINT}"
> >>+	exit 1
> >>+fi
> >>+
> >>+cp ${BUILDROOT_OUTPUT_DIR}/images/zImage ${MOUNT_POINT}
> >
> >Buildroot can do that for you as well. See 'Kernel -> Install kernel image to
> >/boot in target' in menuconfig.
> 
> Buildroot can format and identify the correct microSD device and mount the
> correct partition and then copy the image from output/images to the
> partition? I don't think so. That is what this script and
> board/freescale/create-boot-sd.sh are about.

Right. However, using the boot.scr boot script support of U-Boot (enabled in 
both SolidRun and Freescale U-Boot) would allow Buildroot to generate a single 
boot/root partition. This script, that is running as root, should only to the 
bare minimum, i.e. SD card partitioning.

> In any event, the question is not what Buildroot can do, it is what
> Buildroot *should* do. You want a clean separaration of the build operation
> and the media install operation.

baruch

-- 
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-31  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-30 22:31 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] Solid-Run HummingBoard i2eX defconfig and bootable microSD Bash script Jonathan Ben-Avraham
2015-05-31  7:08 ` Baruch Siach
2015-05-31  7:40   ` Jonathan Ben Avraham
2015-05-31  9:02     ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2015-05-31  9:23       ` Jonathan Ben Avraham
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-01 21:56 Jonathan Ben-Avraham
2015-06-01 22:00 ` Jonathan Ben Avraham
2016-01-12 21:48 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-01-13  5:58   ` Jonathan Ben Avraham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150531090226.GE2282@tarshish \
    --to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox