From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:49:20 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/gcc: fix ARC failure to build in 2 phases. In-Reply-To: References: <1435582227-26345-1-git-send-email-talz@ezchip.com> <20150629162906.415e456f@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150629174920.10f52a00@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:39:12 +0000, Tal Zilcer wrote: > We have one source tree for both build phases of GCC. > First phase must have this patch while second phase must NOT have it. > it doesn't seems reasonable to have two GCC source trees because of this patch. Ah right. I think there's probably a way to write the change so that it does not try to use these object files during the initial gcc build. This is really what the real fix is. > > In any case, I don't think it's worth the effort making that conditional, just register the post-rsync hook unconditionally. > It is only to explain our intentions, do you prefer a comment or just to add the RSYNC hook? For now, we can just add the rsync hook, but... > > BTW, this problem should have been sorted out by the ARC developers, maybe you should ping them about this? > Adding Alexey to this correspondence ... I'd like to hear from Alexey about this, since I reported this issue a while ago now. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com