From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:47:56 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] systemd: fix license according to README file In-Reply-To: <1435696938-19587-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> References: <1435696938-19587-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> Message-ID: <20150630224756.47788250@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Vicente, On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:42:18 +0200, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > diff --git a/package/systemd/systemd.mk b/package/systemd/systemd.mk > index ee17bc8..7094b98 100644 > --- a/package/systemd/systemd.mk > +++ b/package/systemd/systemd.mk > @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ > SYSTEMD_VERSION = 221 > SYSTEMD_SITE = http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd > SYSTEMD_SOURCE = systemd-$(SYSTEMD_VERSION).tar.xz > -SYSTEMD_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1+; GPLv2+ for udev; MIT-like license for few source files listed in README > -SYSTEMD_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.GPL2 LICENSE.LGPL2.1 LICENSE.MIT > +SYSTEMD_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1+; GPLv2 and GPLv2+ for udev; Public Domain license for few source files listed in README Why specify both GPLv2 and GPLv2+ for udev? Also, this string really doesn't look like what we usually do, it should rather be: LGPLv2.1+, GPLv2+ (udev), Public Domain (few source files, see README) and since the README is important to licensing apparently, it should be mentioned in: > +SYSTEMD_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.GPL2 LICENSE.LGPL2.1 Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com