From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:52:10 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Update from polarssl to mbed 1.3.11 In-Reply-To: <55A8311B.30503@mind.be> References: <1437080329-96500-1-git-send-email-eswierk@skyportsystems.com> <20150716231142.6486d101@free-electrons.com> <55A8311B.30503@mind.be> Message-ID: <20150717095210.223e90bb@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Arnout, Ed, On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:32:59 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > Thanks for your patch. However, following Gustavo's comment, I've > > marked your patch as "Changes Requested" in our patch tracking system. > > Can you resubmit a new version that takes into account Gustavo's > > comments? > > Since it anyway is not compatible and upstream changed name, perhaps it's > better just to create a new package called mbedtls? When we remove polarssl we > can make a legacy entry to point to mbedtls. Why would we remove polarssl? Is the project dead? Or is mbedtls its replacement? Other than that, yes: if mbedtls is like a new library that is incompatible with polarssl, then a separate package is the best option. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com