From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:07:10 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] openssl: use git formatted patches In-Reply-To: <1431803078-27629-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> References: <1431803078-27629-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150720160710.4707d820@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Gustavo, On Sat, 16 May 2015 21:04:37 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Using Git formatted patches makes it easier to adjust the patches when > needed. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni Since you are the de-facto maintainer of the OpenSSL package, could you give your opinion about the two patches in this series. I believe PATCH 1/2 is OK, but what do you think about PATCH 2/2 ? Back in November 2014, Bernd also submitted some patches to enable parallel build of OpenSSL, see http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2014-November/112183.html. Peter and I rejected them because they were a bit big. My proposal relies on downloading Gentoo patches instead, but I don't now if it's really any better, since those patches may cause some problems in the future to bump OpenSSL. What do you think? Should we simply wait for OpenSSL upstream to see the light and support parallel build? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com