From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 22:57:24 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] rtl8188eu: new package In-Reply-To: <55AE72C8.10405@lucaceresoli.net> References: <1436188175-7912-1-git-send-email-luca@lucaceresoli.net> <1436188175-7912-2-git-send-email-luca@lucaceresoli.net> <20150718233012.5293b49f@free-electrons.com> <55AE72C8.10405@lucaceresoli.net> Message-ID: <20150721225724.401300ef@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Luca, On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:26:48 +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > > Can you respin a new version? In the mean time, I'll mark this one as > > "Changes Requested" in patchwork. > > It's on my todo list. > > However, I still haven't understood your opinion about using mdev > without devtmpfs (it's for firmware loading in this case)... I think it's OK to support this case. People using kernels older than 2.6.32 are stuck with static /dev and may have to load firmwares. Now, I'm wondering if we should simply make the "mdev" /dev management option work with both static /dev *and* devtmpfs, or if we should have something like "mdev with static /dev" and "mdev with devtmpfs". Do you have some proposals? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com