From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:48:19 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] binutils: bump 2.25.x series to 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <1437573697-12191-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1437573697-12191-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20150722164819.2b9474e8@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Gustavo Zacarias, On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:01:37 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > - config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_25 > - bool "binutils 2.25" > + config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_25_1 > + bool "binutils 2.25.1" I know we haven't been doing this so far, but should we name the option 2_25_X like we do for gcc, and therefore avoid renaming the option for every minor release ? Or keep it named 2_25 even if the version is 2.25.1, I don't really care. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com