From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:41:58 +0300 Subject: [Buildroot] buildroot for SAMA5D3 illegal instruction In-Reply-To: <20150722171602.766be19e@free-electrons.com> References: <55AF3847.503@mydatex.cz> <20150722085912.66ff27e0@free-electrons.com> <55AF3FF8.4020305@mydatex.cz> <55AFB25A.8040408@mydatex.cz> <20150722171602.766be19e@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150722184158.GO13027@tarshish> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:16:02PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:10:18 +0200, Daniel Smolik wrote: > > > Many many thanks. Problem was in kernel headers. I run kernel 3.12.44 > > and use wrong headers. > > Glad to hear it solved the problem. > > This makes me wonder if using always the latest and greatest kernel > headers by default in Buildroot is a good idea, because it clearly > won't match what most people will need. Maybe we should default to the highest BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_* requirement. Currently this is v3.12 for libseccomp. Or maybe refine the rule to the oldest LTS kernel version that is not lower than highest BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HEADERS_AT_LEAST_* (also v3.12 at the moment). baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -