From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:11:33 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2015-07-22 In-Reply-To: <55B12984.2090104@openwide.fr> References: <20150723063018.EA19A101D01@stock.ovh.net> <55B12984.2090104@openwide.fr> Message-ID: <20150723221133.51e59215@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Romain Naour, On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:51:00 +0200, Romain Naour wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > Le 23/07/2015 08:30, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit : > > Detail of failures > > =================== > > > xtensa | host-gcc-initial-4.9.3 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/56de85f9bc0ba44248003212b5dc4cb8dcde19c5/ > > I noticed a new build failure in autobuilders due to your gcc package patch: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/453849/ Did you notice xtensa or other platforms as well? Before applying Alexey's patch I tested an ARM toolchain build with -O2 and -Os and it built fine. Though it's indeed a problem if it causes a regression on other architectures. Alexey, Max, can you have a look at least for the Xtensa case? If there is no feedback soon, I'll revert Alexey's patch in the mean time. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com