From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:53:25 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/9] docs/manual: document gcc version dependencies In-Reply-To: <20150805110552.1846c7bf@free-electrons.com> References: <1438711241-31792-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1438711241-31792-5-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20150804195858.GW3647@free.fr> <20150805110552.1846c7bf@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150805195325.GD3647@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, All, On 2015-08-05 11:05 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:58:58 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > > +* GCC version > > > +** Dependency symbol: +BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_X_Y+, (replace > > > + +X_Y+ with the proper version, see +toolchain/toolchain-common.in+) > > > +** Comment string: +gcc >= X.Y+ and/or `gcc <= X.Y` (replace > > > > One of the condition is between ++ and the other between ``. I konow you > > just replicated what was done for the kernel headers, but wuld it not be > > better to use only ++ (or only ``, I don't mind) but not both? > > There is actually a good reason for that: if you use +...+ for +gcc <= > X.Y+, then the <= gets replaced by the <= mathematic character rather > than being the two characters < and =. Ah, right. Now I remember why they were different. Still, we should not mix the two possibilities, and just use `` since that's what works. > So I've kept the special use of `...` for the time being. Yep, good. I'll prepare a patch to fix that. Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'