From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] protobuf/protobuf-c: bump versions
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:37:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150814123735.GB4017@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALoSW66YprLV_WKuWUrPgzT9hL2JzBh69ggg2dNE3rxEkXohXg@mail.gmail.com>
Nimai, All,
On 2015-08-14 08:29 -0400, Nimai Mahajan spake thusly:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
> > On 2015-08-13 21:41 -0400, Nimai Mahajan spake thusly:
[--SNIP--]
> >> diff --git a/package/protobuf/protobuf.mk b/package/protobuf/protobuf.mk
> >> index 0426fce..144e5fb 100644
> >> --- a/package/protobuf/protobuf.mk
> >> +++ b/package/protobuf/protobuf.mk
> >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> >> #
> >> ################################################################################
> >>
> >> -PROTOBUF_VERSION = v2.5.0
> >> +PROTOBUF_VERSION = v2.6.1
> >
> > Last time we tried to bump protobuf to v2.6.0, we got a lot of build
> > failures, so the bump was reverted;
> > http://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?id=7b6304af9d69d44ee3040c00b0670f19c02de7d2
> > http://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?id=61ae22810a8ca90d3b904d89eb3892c6cf92e87c
>
> Sorry, I had no idea this was already tried to be pushed up ... I did
> try to search for this but gmane doesn't make that very easy.
No problem! I only knew about the revert because I was investigating the
static build faiulures, and also considered the bump... ;-)
> > Did you test under various conditions, such as:
> > - static-only (2.5.0 currently fails in this case, I'm lookimng into it)
> > - the various supported architectures: arm, i386, mipsel, x86_64
> > - with various C libraries: uClibc, musl, glibc
> >
> > If you did, then good! :-)
>
> Bah no I did not :-( I only tested with arm and i386 and glibc as I
> have toolchains for these both. I would love to set up an environment
> where I can test all these combinations more easily before pushing
> something up ... what would be your recommendation for doing that?
You can start with any of those defconfig:
static based on uClibc:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/toolchains/configs/br-arm-full-static.config
based on musl (but need to manually set static):
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/toolchains/configs/br-arm-cortex-a9-musl.config
Save them locally, and run:
make BR2_DEFCONFIG=/path/to/where/you/saved/br-arm-full-static.config defconfig
make menuconfig
-- enable protobuf
-- exit
make protobuf
(Similarly for the musl build, but you need to enable static-only in the
menuconfig).
> > Otherwise, I'd like this bump to at least be tested in the musl and
> > static-only scenario (to see if that improves the situation...)
> >
> > Also, it seems v2.6.x adds proper support for PowerPC.
>
> Yes, 2.6.1 also fixes a bunch of bugs (we use protocol buffers in
> production code and can attest to this) so I wanted to get it up there
> but needs a lot more testing with getting built with various
> configurations first.
>
> I can certainly at least try a musl static build with this.
OK, great! Thanks! :-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-14 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-14 1:41 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] protobuf/protobuf-c: bump versions Nimai Mahajan
2015-08-14 12:19 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-14 12:29 ` Nimai Mahajan
2015-08-14 12:37 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2015-08-14 15:11 ` Nimai Mahajan
2015-08-14 15:42 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-14 15:54 ` Nimai Mahajan
2015-08-14 16:45 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-15 9:28 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-08-16 0:09 ` Nimai Mahajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150814123735.GB4017@free.fr \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox