From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:34:21 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package: add comment about ipkg/opkg/rpm
In-Reply-To: <55DB7413.4060109@mind.be>
References: <1440085901-24479-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
 <55D8FA56.5020009@mind.be> <20150823094750.GC3729@free.fr>
 <55DB7413.4060109@mind.be>
Message-ID: <20150824203421.GF3619@free.fr>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Arnout, All,

On 2015-08-24 21:44 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle spake thusly:
> On 08/23/2015 11:47 AM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > On 2015-08-23 00:40 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle spake thusly:
> [snip]
> >>
> >>  Don't know how important this is, but on a 80-character display it gets chopped
> >> off after the faq-no-. But I guess there's not much we can do about it.
> >> Except perhaps: http://nightly.buildroot.org/manual.html#faq-no-binary-packages
> >> - still doesn't fit but at least we get to the binary-pa :-)
> > 
> > What about;
> > 
> >     comment "-----------------------------------------------------"
> >     comment "Please note:                                         "
> >     comment "- Buildroot does *not* generate binary packages,     "
> >     comment "- Buildroot does *not* install any package database. "
> >     comment "*                                                    "
> >     comment "It is up to you to provide those by yourself if you  "
> >     comment "want to use any of those package managers.           "
> >     comment "*                                                    "
> >     comment "See the manual:                                      "
> >     comment "http://buildroot.org/downloads/manual/manaul.html#faq"
> >     comment "-no-binary-packages                                  "
> >     comment "-----------------------------------------------------"
> > 
> > This does fit on a 80-char wide terminal, and we get the complete URL on
> > two lines.
> 
>  ... which is also not ideal, since it means that the URL can't be copy&paste'd
> easily, and that people with a modern terminal that is more than 80 characters
> wide can't ctrl-click (or whatever) to open the URL directly.

Right, but then, it's better than npthing, no?

>  So I think it's best to use the slightly shorter nightly URL and keep it
> non-wrapped.

I would not like we use the nightly version, just because nightly is
not stable.

>  Or actually, it's best to add a manual.html -> downloads/manual/manual.html
> symlink to the website and refer to that. This fits easily:
> http://buildroot.org/manual.html#faq-no-binary-packages
> And it also makes it easier for us to refer to the manual in other places.
> 
>  Peter, what do you think of such a symlink?

At least, I'd like that.

Since I have access to the server, if Peter agrees, I can try to
configure the apache server for that.

But note that this apache server also serves ulibc and busybox.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'