From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:32:23 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Add missing config to RPM target package In-Reply-To: <55DCC1F6.4060008@gmx.de> References: <55D70AF3.3050604@gmx.de> <20150823200604.0c1e00cb@free-electrons.com> <55DCC1F6.4060008@gmx.de> Message-ID: <20150831163223.67982cd3@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Andreas Ehmanns, On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:28:54 +0200, Andreas Ehmanns wrote: > in my first try I had no pcre support, so rpm package was built with > --with-pcre=none > Trying to install a binary rpm just containing one file on my target > system failed at the very beginning when rpm was checking package > dependencies. Setting --with-pcre=internal solved this problem. So it > seems to me that pcre is necessary to to dependency checks which is in > my opinion one of the main features or rpm. Isn't it? If that's indeed the case, then pcre support is really mandatory for RPM to be useful. Therefore, can you send a patch to make the pcre dependency a mandatory one? Don't forget to add a comment explaining why we're making it mandatory even if RPM makes it an optional dependency. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com