From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 21:07:33 +0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/4] package/rpm: bump to version 4.12.0.1 In-Reply-To: <1441041977-9160-1-git-send-email-james.knight@rockwellcollins.com> References: <1441041977-9160-1-git-send-email-james.knight@rockwellcollins.com> Message-ID: <20150831180733.GL17874@tarshish> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi James, On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:26:14PM -0400, James Knight wrote: > The provided "bump" (suggested by Baruch Siach) switches from the rpm5 > implementation to rpm.org's more active stream. > > Signed-off-by: James Knight > --- [...] > diff --git a/package/rpm/Config.in b/package/rpm/Config.in > index c6fc3b7..e79e9ce 100644 > --- a/package/rpm/Config.in > +++ b/package/rpm/Config.in > @@ -1,21 +1,29 @@ > -comment "rpm needs a toolchain w/ threads" > +comment "rpm needs a toolchain w/ threads and beecrypt or libnss" > depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS > + depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_BEECRYPT && !BR2_PACKAGE_LIBNSS > depends on BR2_USE_MMU # fork() > > config BR2_PACKAGE_RPM > bool "rpm" > depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS # beecrypt > depends on BR2_USE_MMU # fork() > - select BR2_PACKAGE_BEECRYPT > + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_BEECRYPT || BR2_PACKAGE_LIBNSS The convention is to do this instead: select BR2_PACKAGE_BEECRYPT if !BR2_PACKAGE_LIBNSS Assuming that beecrypt is more lightweight then libnss (is it?). This also obviates the need for the dependency comment change above. baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -