From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:28:32 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers In-Reply-To: <20150908120122.7662cb86@free-electrons.com> References: <55EDE7A6.4060902@mind.be> <55EE8B90.9060708@mind.be> <20150908120122.7662cb86@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150908112832.GC3237@piout.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi, On 08/09/2015 at 12:01:22 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote : > Arnout, > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:17:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > > > http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot > > > > Well, the linux4sam fork is relatively old. In addition, there are some changes > > in it that are incorrect. So I'd stick to upstream buildroot :-) > > My colleague Alexandre Belloni has recently updated or added numerous > Atmel defconfigs, and Atmel's plan is to deprecate their Buildroot fork > and to just tell people to use the upstream version (at least that's > what I understood). > > Alex? > It is deprecated, this will be announced this week. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com