From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:01:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Right board to use -- buildroot begniers In-Reply-To: <55EE8B90.9060708@mind.be> References: <55EDE7A6.4060902@mind.be> <55EE8B90.9060708@mind.be> Message-ID: <20150908120122.7662cb86@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Arnout, On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:17:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildRoot > > Well, the linux4sam fork is relatively old. In addition, there are some changes > in it that are incorrect. So I'd stick to upstream buildroot :-) My colleague Alexandre Belloni has recently updated or added numerous Atmel defconfigs, and Atmel's plan is to deprecate their Buildroot fork and to just tell people to use the upstream version (at least that's what I understood). Alex? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com