Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] micropython: new package
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:23:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150915102352.2d4ab396@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFOYHZDbMnHj=Lmh27YUSwpMSjD_9R4VFomXVo4nWF8Gg3c4tQ@mail.gmail.com>

Chris,

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:01:08 +1200, Chris Packham wrote:

> >  * What happens if we have Micropython installed next to the regular
> >    Python 2 or Python 3 interpreters / standard library on the same
> >    system? Do they conflict or not?
> 
> They're installed in with different executable names and library paths
> so they should co-exist happily.

Good.

> >  * What about all the Python external modules (package/python-*/) we
> >    have in Buildroot? Do they work with Micropython?
> 
> Probably depends on the module, but I assume the answer is mostly no.

Ok. Anyway, the Python external modules are installed
in /usr/lib/python<version>/, so micropython will not see them. So
we're safe if someone enables both micropython, python 2 and a bunch of
python external modules: python 2 will allow to use the python external
modules, and micropython will live its own life without providing
access to the python external modules.

> Some of the "standard" libraries in micropython-lib are stubs to quote
> the readme: "micropython-lib is a highly experimental community
> project". Getting into buildroot is one way of helping them to move
> out of "experimental" status.

Sure, makes sense.

> >> +MICROPYTHON_LIB_VERSION = v0.5
> >> +MICROPYTHON_LIB_SITE = $(call github,micropython,micropython-lib,$(MICROPYTHON_LIB_VERSION))
> >> +MICROPYTHON_LIB_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE
> >
> > You should define MICROPYTHON_LIB_LICENSE as well.
> 
> That's an interesting problem. It's actually multiple licenses
> (depending on the source of the library) so nothing in the "normal"[1]
> list fits. I could say "various" or enumerate the ones I can identify
> but it would be hard to be accurate.

Isn't it a bit problematic for an open-source project to not have a
clear license (or list of licenses) ? It basically means that you can't
safely redistribute it.

I believe listing all the licenses is the proper course of action here.
Something like:

<foo>_LICENSE = MIT (this, that), BSD-2c (foo, bar)

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-15  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-14 10:21 [Buildroot] [PATCH] micropython: new package Chris Packham
2015-09-14 13:06 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-14 23:14   ` Chris Packham
2015-09-14 13:40 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-14 22:44   ` Chris Packham
2015-09-14 13:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-09-14 14:12   ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-14 23:03     ` Chris Packham
2015-09-15  8:24       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-09-15 19:49       ` Jörg Krause
2015-09-14 23:01   ` Chris Packham
2015-09-15  8:23     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-09-15  0:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCHv2] " Chris Packham
2015-09-15 10:14   ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-15 10:19     ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-15 21:30       ` Chris Packham
2015-09-15 22:03     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-09-15 21:54   ` Chris Packham
2015-09-15 22:49     ` [Buildroot] [PATCHv3] " Chris Packham
2015-09-16  6:25       ` Jerzy Grzegorek
2015-09-16 21:12       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-09-16 23:28         ` Chris Packham
2015-09-16 23:29           ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 0/2] Micropython package Chris Packham
2015-09-16 23:29             ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/2] micropython: new package Chris Packham
2015-09-17  8:56               ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-18  4:54                 ` Chris Packham
2015-09-16 23:29             ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/2] micropython-lib: new packages Chris Packham
2015-09-17  8:56               ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-17 21:48             ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 0/2] Micropython package Thomas Petazzoni
2015-09-18  7:32             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-09-18  8:22               ` Chris Packham
2015-09-18  9:19                 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] micropython: Set MICROPY_GCREGS_SETJMP=1 for xtensa and sh Chris Packham
2015-09-19 12:00                   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-09-18  9:29                 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 0/2] Micropython package Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-18  9:43                   ` Chris Packham
2015-09-18  9:51                     ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] micropython: Set MPZ_DIG_SIZE=32 for 64 bit targets Chris Packham
2015-09-18 10:02                       ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-19  9:19                         ` Chris Packham
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-14 10:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH] micropython: new package Chris Packham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150915102352.2d4ab396@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox