From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:03:25 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCHv2] micropython: new package In-Reply-To: <55F7EF95.30001@imgtec.com> References: <1442226102-15878-1-git-send-email-judge.packham@gmail.com> <1442275305-10690-1-git-send-email-judge.packham@gmail.com> <55F7EF95.30001@imgtec.com> Message-ID: <20150916000325.5be2a54e@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Vicente, Chris, On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:14:45 +0100, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > As Thomas suggested, improve that by listing the licenses. According to > the LICENSE file, everything is MIT unless the setup.py of each module > says something different, so I have done a quick check: > > $ find micropython-lib-v0.5/ -type f -name "setup.py" -exec grep license > {} \; | sort -u > license='MIT', > license='Python', > > So I think it would be enough by just having: > > MICROPYTHON_LIB_LICENSE = Python (some modules), MIT (everything else) > > Thomas, what do you think? I haven't checked micropython source code myself, but what you propose looks sensible, to the exception that "Python" isn't a license. The license of Python is "Python software foundation license v2". Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com