From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 23:01:36 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] lxc needs gzip scripts for lxc-checkconfig runtime In-Reply-To: References: <1442761327-18830-1-git-send-email-yba@tkos.co.il> <20150920190622.3f7278c3@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150920230136.513b491c@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Jonathan, On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:15:02 +0300 (IDT), Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote: > I wondered whether to send a patch for each 'select' individually or to > wait until I complete my testing and submit a single patch with all of the > lxc selects. What do you prefer? Both solutions are fine with me. You can send patches as you progressively discover the issues, or send a single patch fixing all problems at once. I'm just wondering if we want to make all these dependencies actually mandatory or not. It seems some of these dependencies are only used for one specific tool in LXC. If the tool is not crucial in LXC usage, maybe we should make it optional via a sub-option? I'm not sure here, just thinking out loud. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com