Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 1/1] squeezelite: new package
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:36:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150921113629.0fc4f356@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201509210347.t8L3lcth017495@ms-omx02.plus.so-net.ne.jp>

Hello,

On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:47:38 +0900, kei-k at ca2.so-net.ne.jp wrote:

> +config BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE_ENABLE_RESAMPLE
> +	bool "Enable resampling function"
> +	default y
> +	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE
> +	help
> +	  Enable resampling function
> +
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE_WITH_RESAMPLE_MP
> +	bool "Use OpenMP for resampling"
> +	default y
> +	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE_ENABLE_RESAMPLE
> +	help
> +	  Enable OpenMP support for resampling

The naming of the options is a bit inconsistent: "ENABLE" in one case
and "WITH" in the other case. I believe in fact you could simplify the
option naming to just:

BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE_RESAMPLE
BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE_RESAMPLE_OPENMP

However, I'm a bit worried about the OpenMP option. Does it require
OpenMP support in the toolchain? If yes, then not all toolchains have
OpenMP support, so we should handle that.

> +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE_ENABLE_RESAMPLE),y)
> +	SQUEEZELITE_MAKE_OPTS += -DRESAMPLE
> +	ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE_WITH_RESAMPLE_MP),y)

Since BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE_WITH_RESAMPLE_MP already depends on
BR2_PACKAGE_SQUEEZELITE_ENABLE_RESAMPLE, there's no real need to nest
the two tests. They can be made two separate tests.

> +		SQUEEZELITE_MAKE_OPTS += -DRESAMPLE_MP
> +	endif
> +endif
> +
> +define SQUEEZELITE_BUILD_CMDS
> +    $(TARGET_MAKE_ENV) $(MAKE) OPTS="$(SQUEEZELITE_MAKE_OPTS)" \
> +	CC="$(TARGET_CC)" LD="$(TARGET_LD)" -C $(@D) all

Have you tried using $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) instead of manually
passing CC and LD ?

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-21  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-21  3:47 [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 1/1] squeezelite: new package kei-k at ca2.so-net.ne.jp
2015-09-21  8:44 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-21  9:34   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-09-21  9:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-09-22  1:11   ` 川島 浩
2015-09-22  2:52     ` 川島 浩

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150921113629.0fc4f356@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox