From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/lua: do not install man files
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:01:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150922160121.2c878fa6@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442876342-10841-1-git-send-email-joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
Hello J?rg,
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:59:02 +0200, J?rg Krause wrote:
> As written in the holy manual:
> http://buildroot.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#faq-no-doc-on-target
>
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
> ---
> package/lua/lua.mk | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/package/lua/lua.mk b/package/lua/lua.mk
> index 1279b76..af5cef3 100644
> --- a/package/lua/lua.mk
> +++ b/package/lua/lua.mk
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ define HOST_LUA_BUILD_CMDS
> endef
>
> define LUA_INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS
> - $(MAKE) INSTALL_TOP="$(STAGING_DIR)/usr" -C $(@D) install
> + $(MAKE) INSTALL_TOP="$(STAGING_DIR)/usr" INSTALL_MAN= -C $(@D) install
> $(INSTALL) -m 0644 -D $(@D)/etc/lua.pc \
> $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/pkgconfig/lua.pc
> endef
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ define LUA_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS
> endef
>
> define HOST_LUA_INSTALL_CMDS
> - $(MAKE) INSTALL_TOP="$(HOST_DIR)/usr" -C $(@D) install
> + $(MAKE) INSTALL_TOP="$(HOST_DIR)/usr" INSTALL_MAN= -C $(@D) install
> $(INSTALL) -m 0644 -D $(@D)/etc/lua.pc \
> $(HOST_DIR)/usr/lib/pkgconfig/lua.pc
> endef
This is in fact not needed. Buildroot is already removing the man pages
in the target-finalize step of the main Makefile. I have checked, the
Lua man pages are installed in standard locations, so they are properly
removed by this generic removal step.
For this reason, I am not sure it is really worth to add more
complexity to a package to avoid doing something that is anyway already
handled at some later point in a generic way. It would be worth if that
thing was actually taking a significant amount of build time, or
required additional dependencies. But it's not the case here, so i
would be tempted to leave the Lua package as is, and not take this
patch.
Opinions?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-21 22:59 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/lua: do not install man files Jörg Krause
2015-09-22 14:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-09-22 18:56 ` Jörg Krause
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150922160121.2c878fa6@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox