From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Suykov Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 01:52:34 +0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC 1/2] non-versioned packages In-Reply-To: <20150930221517.GA3702@free.fr> References: <39cc9541d430e29d38dc07ef2c1d975687cf2af3.1443645945.git.alex.suykov@gmail.com> <20150930221517.GA3702@free.fr> Message-ID: <20150930225234.GA29781@vostro> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > And yes, I would like to keep being able to have packages without a > version.Even if upstream are not playing by the rules, it is perfectly > legit that we have support for that. Sorry, bad wording in patch description. Packages with explicitly set (PKG)_SOURCE are ok, they only get build dir name change: output/build/initscripts-undefined -> output/build/initscripts and so on. The change is for packages that lack both _VERSION and _SOURCE. Current BR behavior is to assign (PKG)_SOURCE = (pkg)-undefined.tar.gz and try to download that, which I think is never correct. It's either explicitly-set custom SOURCE, or no sources at all.