From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:24:08 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] axfs: add new filesystem type In-Reply-To: <561CF52D.3090609@vanguardiasur.com.ar> References: <1444064102-13575-1-git-send-email-ariel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <1444064102-13575-3-git-send-email-ariel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <5612C712.6020209@mind.be> <561CF52D.3090609@vanguardiasur.com.ar> Message-ID: <20151013202408.GA4161@free.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Ariel, All, On 2015-10-13 09:12 -0300, Ariel D'Alessandro spake thusly: > El 05/10/15 a las 15:53, Arnout Vandecappelle escribi?: [--SNIP--] > >> +define ROOTFS_AXFS_CMD > >> + $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin/mkfs.axfs -s -a $(TARGET_DIR) $@ > > > > I'm not sure if we really want to give the -s option. Is it very verbose? > > Generally I like a bit of feedback about how the filesystem is built, and we do > > get it for e.g. squashfs. > > Yeah, I think it's very verbose. But on the other hand, with the -s > option it's too quiet. > I don't know what is the main criteria. Maybe you can tell me, here's > the output of two mkfs.axfs executions with and without -s option: > > -- > $ ./mkfs.axfs -s -a target/ output/ > number of files: 585 > number of 4KB nodes: 1752 > > Total image size: 5111906 > -- > > -- > $ ./mkfs.axfs -a target/ output/ [--SNIP--] > Total image size: 5111906 IMHO, the non-silent version is way too verbose. I'd prefer that the -s flag be used. Arnout, OK for you? Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'