From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:10:30 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/5] gtest: Upgrade to GitHub HEAD In-Reply-To: <561ED08C.5010301@softiron.co.uk> References: <1444859483-2268-1-git-send-email-alan@softiron.co.uk> <1444859483-2268-5-git-send-email-alan@softiron.co.uk> <20151014235522.774491e2@free-electrons.com> <561ED08C.5010301@softiron.co.uk> Message-ID: <20151015091030.2f7272ec@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Alan Ott, On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:00:44 -0400, Alan Ott wrote: > > So gtest and gmock are in fact now part of the same repository/upstream > > project ? If that's the case, then I think we should simply get rid of > > the gtest and gmock packages, and have a single package named > > "googletest". > > Yes, that would probably be better. gmock depends on gtest, and gtest > can be standalone. Maybe we have one package with a submenu option to > build each target (and a dependency so gmock selects gtest). > > Is that ok by you? Yes, that's OK. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com